Welcome To Animal Law Review Symposium
Animal Law Review is pleased to invite you to the
inaugural Animal Law Review Symposium.
Registration for Oregon CLE credits is available on the
Registration page.
The
Animal Law Review
Symposium will feature some of the leading voices in
international animal law, with presentations from:
David Cassuto,
Professor of Law at Pace Law School
Maneesha Deckha,
Professor of Law at the University of Victoria (Canada)
David Favre, Professor
of Law at Michigan State University College of Law
Peter Sankoff,
Associate Professor at the University of Western Canada.
David Cassuto, Professor
of Law at Pace Law School
Hot, Cruel, and Legal:
A Look at Industrial Agriculture and Climate Change in the
U.S. & Brazil
The U.S. pioneered and still leads the world in factory
farming. Brazil is the world’s largest producer of beef and
has a growing confinement agriculture sector. Industrial
agriculture, in addition to severely mistreating animals, is a
significant contributor to climate change. This paper examines
the legal and regulatory regime in both countries and offers
some thoughts on why, in an age of growing sensitivity to
environmental degradation and animal cruelty, the industry
continues to thrive.
Maneesha Deckha, Professor of Law at the University of
Victoria (Canada)
Critical
Animal Studies and Animal Law
A growing interest within cultural studies in the “animal
question” has produced what some have called a “burgeoning”
literature known as critical animal studies. Critical animal
studies has grown as a field at the same time that interest in
animal law has flourished in American law schools. For the
most part, however, these two disciplines have developed
independently of each other. In this presentation, Professor
Deckha outlines the primary contributions of critical animal
studies as an emerging field and explains why animal law would
benefit from incorporating its insights. Professor Deckha also
explains why animal legal advocacy in general should develop a
more interdisciplinary orientation.
David Favre, Professor of Law at Michigan State University
College of Law
Is
an International Treaty for Animal Welfare Needed and
Possible?
While cultural context vary between nations, the relationships
between humans and animals have a commonality worldwide. The
creation of an international standard for the humane treatment
of animals would be beneficial to countries that seek to
address these issues for the first time. It is also important
to have international standards because when individual
countries seek to enhance the welfare of animals, these
standards can be attacked as trade barriers under the World
Trade Organization provisions. The nature, scope and
limitations of an international animal welfare treaty will be
considered.
Peter Sankoff, Associate Professor at the University of
Western Canada
Animal Welfare Law and
the Concept of Dialogue: Can Welfare Law Simultaneously
Fail and Succeed?
Animal law advocates often debate whether real progress
towards the better treatment of animals can ever occur through
modifications to the welfare status of animals or whether the
abolition of animal exploitation is required for any
significant change. In this presentation, I wish to look at
this question in a different way, by considering the
possibility that some types of animal welfare law, while
“failing” in their own right, can nonetheless improve the
dialogue between the state, its citizens and animal use
industries and as a consequence gradually establish a public
space in which meaningful animal welfare reform can in fact
occur. Looking at the first ten years under the New Zealand
Animal Welfare Act as a case study, I will suggest that the
legislation has been useful in advancing the cause of
long-term animal welfare reform—though not in the way the
legislators might have anticipated. While the Act has failed
to stimulate meaningful reform directly, it has changed the
nature of the dialogue surrounding animal issues in New
Zealand, and in so doing, may well have set the stage for
meaningful changes in future years.
Animal Law Review wishes to
thank the symposium’s co-sponsor,
the Animal Legal Defense Fund.